tips:ingress-egress-netflow
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revisionNext revisionBoth sides next revision | ||
tips:ingress-egress-netflow [2020/11/27 14:04] – [Example : Ingress and Egress enabled on both downstream and upstream interfaces] veera | tips:ingress-egress-netflow [2020/11/27 15:12] – [Performance note about egress netflow] veera | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 44: | Line 44: | ||
The following diagram shows a valid use case. | The following diagram shows a valid use case. | ||
- | {{: | + | [{{: |
In this example the red and blue flows are measured for Netflow at the upstream interfaces only. Hence there will be no duplicate or inconsistent data. | In this example the red and blue flows are measured for Netflow at the upstream interfaces only. Hence there will be no duplicate or inconsistent data. | ||
Line 54: | Line 54: | ||
//Egress NetFlow accounting might adversely affect network performance because of the additional accounting-related computation that occurs in the traffic-forwarding path of the router.// | //Egress NetFlow accounting might adversely affect network performance because of the additional accounting-related computation that occurs in the traffic-forwarding path of the router.// | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | ===== Configuration options in Trisul ===== | ||
+ | |||
+ | Trisul' | ||
+ | |||
+ | If you have a network with incorrectly configured ingress and egress netflow you can ignore the //egress// netflow | ||
tips/ingress-egress-netflow.txt · Last modified: 2020/11/27 16:05 by veera